<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dual Gate MOSFET Investigations - Gain and AGC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nt7s.com/blog/2008/07/dual-gate-mosfet-investigations-gain-and-agc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nt7s.com/blog/2008/07/dual-gate-mosfet-investigations-gain-and-agc/</link>
	<description>Emanations from Amateur Radio Station NT7S</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 14:01:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Volker Kible</title>
		<link>http://www.nt7s.com/blog/2008/07/dual-gate-mosfet-investigations-gain-and-agc/comment-page-1/#comment-616</link>
		<dc:creator>Volker Kible</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 16:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nt7s.com/blog/?p=19#comment-616</guid>
		<description>Hello Jason,

I&#039;m trying to reproduce your measuerements with LTSpice, but it doesn&#039;t really work, my amplifier doesn&#039;t amplify. Maybe there&#039;s something wrong with the model i&#039;m using, or my circuit is not correct. I hope you have some experience with Spice and can help me. I&#039;m new to Spice...

Thanx &amp; Regards!
Volker

This is the model i&#039;m using (i changed the original model of NXP [http://www.nxp.com/models/spicespar/fet/BF998.html] a bit to get it running in LTSpice IV, maybe i destroyed it):
*   BF998 SPICE MODEL OCTOBER 1993 PHILIPS SEMICONDUCTORS
*   ENVELOPE    SOT143 (R)
*   1.: SOURCE;  2.: DRAIN;  3.: GATE 2;  4.: GATE 1;
.SUBCKT BF998 1 2 3 4
        L10          1 10   0.12N
        L20          2 20   0.12N
        L30          3 30   0.12N
        L40          4 40   0.12N
        L11         10 11   1.20N
        L21         20 21   1.20N
        L31         30 31   1.20N
        L41         40 41   1.20N
        C13         10 30   0.085P
        C14         10 40   0.085P
        C23         20 30   0.085P
        C24         20 40   0.005P
        D11         42 11   ZENER
        D12         42 41   ZENER
        D21         32 11   ZENER
        D22         32 31   ZENER
        RS          10 12   100
        MOS1        61 41 11 12 GATE1
        MOS2        21 31 61 12 GATE2

.MODEL  ZENER  D(BV=10 CJO=1.2E-12  RS=10)

.MODEL  GATE1
+  NMOS(W=1.1E-6 L=1150E-6 LEVEL=3 UO=600  VTO=-0.250 NFS=300E9 TOX=42E-9
+  NSUB=3E15 VMAX=140E3 RS=2.0 RD=2.0 XJ=200E-9 THETA=0.11
+  ETA=0.06 KAPPA=2 LD=0.1E-6
+  CGSO=0.3E-9 CGDO=0.3E-9 CBD=0.5E-12 CBS=0.5E-12)

.MODEL  GATE2 
+  NMOS(W=2.0E-6 L=1150E-6 LEVEL=3 UO=600  VTO=-0.250 NFS=300E9 TOX=42E-9
+  NSUB=3E15  VMAX=100E3 RS=2.0 RD=2.0 XJ=200E-9 THETA=0.11
+  ETA=0.06  KAPPA=2 LD=0.1E-6
+  CGSO=0.3E-9 CGDO=0.3E-9 CBD=0.5E-12 CBS=0.5E-12)

.ENDS BF998</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Jason,</p>
<p>I'm trying to reproduce your measuerements with LTSpice, but it doesn't really work, my amplifier doesn't amplify. Maybe there's something wrong with the model i'm using, or my circuit is not correct. I hope you have some experience with Spice and can help me. I'm new to Spice...</p>
<p>Thanx &amp; Regards!<br />
Volker</p>
<p>This is the model i'm using (i changed the original model of NXP [http://www.nxp.com/models/spicespar/fet/BF998.html] a bit to get it running in LTSpice IV, maybe i destroyed it):<br />
*   BF998 SPICE MODEL OCTOBER 1993 PHILIPS SEMICONDUCTORS<br />
*   ENVELOPE    SOT143 (R)<br />
*   1.: SOURCE;  2.: DRAIN;  3.: GATE 2;  4.: GATE 1;<br />
.SUBCKT BF998 1 2 3 4<br />
        L10          1 10   0.12N<br />
        L20          2 20   0.12N<br />
        L30          3 30   0.12N<br />
        L40          4 40   0.12N<br />
        L11         10 11   1.20N<br />
        L21         20 21   1.20N<br />
        L31         30 31   1.20N<br />
        L41         40 41   1.20N<br />
        C13         10 30   0.085P<br />
        C14         10 40   0.085P<br />
        C23         20 30   0.085P<br />
        C24         20 40   0.005P<br />
        D11         42 11   ZENER<br />
        D12         42 41   ZENER<br />
        D21         32 11   ZENER<br />
        D22         32 31   ZENER<br />
        RS          10 12   100<br />
        MOS1        61 41 11 12 GATE1<br />
        MOS2        21 31 61 12 GATE2</p>
<p>.MODEL  ZENER  D(BV=10 CJO=1.2E-12  RS=10)</p>
<p>.MODEL  GATE1<br />
+  NMOS(W=1.1E-6 L=1150E-6 LEVEL=3 UO=600  VTO=-0.250 NFS=300E9 TOX=42E-9<br />
+  NSUB=3E15 VMAX=140E3 RS=2.0 RD=2.0 XJ=200E-9 THETA=0.11<br />
+  ETA=0.06 KAPPA=2 LD=0.1E-6<br />
+  CGSO=0.3E-9 CGDO=0.3E-9 CBD=0.5E-12 CBS=0.5E-12)</p>
<p>.MODEL  GATE2<br />
+  NMOS(W=2.0E-6 L=1150E-6 LEVEL=3 UO=600  VTO=-0.250 NFS=300E9 TOX=42E-9<br />
+  NSUB=3E15  VMAX=100E3 RS=2.0 RD=2.0 XJ=200E-9 THETA=0.11<br />
+  ETA=0.06  KAPPA=2 LD=0.1E-6<br />
+  CGSO=0.3E-9 CGDO=0.3E-9 CBD=0.5E-12 CBS=0.5E-12)</p>
<p>.ENDS BF998</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NT7S</title>
		<link>http://www.nt7s.com/blog/2008/07/dual-gate-mosfet-investigations-gain-and-agc/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>NT7S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nt7s.com/blog/?p=19#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Hello Kari,

I did not make the variable drain current measurements that you have described, but that would make for a great follow up experiment. The intriguing thing about dual-gate MOSFETs is the different ways that you can bias them. If you get around to that experiment before I do, please let me know what you find.

73,
Jason NT7S</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Kari,</p>
<p>I did not make the variable drain current measurements that you have described, but that would make for a great follow up experiment. The intriguing thing about dual-gate MOSFETs is the different ways that you can bias them. If you get around to that experiment before I do, please let me know what you find.</p>
<p>73,<br />
Jason NT7S</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kba</title>
		<link>http://www.nt7s.com/blog/2008/07/dual-gate-mosfet-investigations-gain-and-agc/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>kba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nt7s.com/blog/?p=19#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Hello OM

Just read the AGC characteristics with great interest...
One thing I became curious was the very odd AGC/gain constant
which varies so much as the gain decreases...
Did you happen to measure the fet Id current / gain dependency ? I have IF amplifier under construction and have plan to base the signal strength indication to fet Id current value which I believe is more linear in relation to gain reduction.
This takes some time to verify as measurement waits the whole
IF strip &amp; AGC to be finished...

br Kari B
   Oh6io</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello OM</p>
<p>Just read the AGC characteristics with great interest...<br />
One thing I became curious was the very odd AGC/gain constant<br />
which varies so much as the gain decreases...<br />
Did you happen to measure the fet Id current / gain dependency ? I have IF amplifier under construction and have plan to base the signal strength indication to fet Id current value which I believe is more linear in relation to gain reduction.<br />
This takes some time to verify as measurement waits the whole<br />
IF strip &amp; AGC to be finished...</p>
<p>br Kari B<br />
   Oh6io</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

