<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EFHWA Revisited</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nt7s.com/blog/2010/03/efhwa-revisited/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nt7s.com/blog/2010/03/efhwa-revisited/</link>
	<description>Emanations from Amateur Radio Station NT7S</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 14:01:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: NT7S</title>
		<link>http://www.nt7s.com/blog/2010/03/efhwa-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>NT7S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 13:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nt7s.com/blog/?p=525#comment-146</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;ll be pleasantly surprised by how well the EFHW works. If you deploy it vertically, you of course get a nice, low takeoff angle. I haven&#039;t had a chance to try one since ol&#039; Sol started making his comeback, but I bet it will be great for the upper HF bands now that propagation is picking up a bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you'll be pleasantly surprised by how well the EFHW works. If you deploy it vertically, you of course get a nice, low takeoff angle. I haven't had a chance to try one since ol' Sol started making his comeback, but I bet it will be great for the upper HF bands now that propagation is picking up a bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AA7EE</title>
		<link>http://www.nt7s.com/blog/2010/03/efhwa-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>AA7EE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 13:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nt7s.com/blog/?p=525#comment-145</guid>
		<description>Great stuff - thanks for posting Jason.  When portable, I&#039;ve used a Buddipole and Buddistick, wire dipoles, and an endfed 85 foot wire with a 17 foot counterpoise (the W3EDP antenna), but I&#039;ve had it in my mind to try the EFHW for a while now. I think this will be my next portable antenna. Polyvaricons and toroids here we come!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great stuff - thanks for posting Jason.  When portable, I've used a Buddipole and Buddistick, wire dipoles, and an endfed 85 foot wire with a 17 foot counterpoise (the W3EDP antenna), but I've had it in my mind to try the EFHW for a while now. I think this will be my next portable antenna. Polyvaricons and toroids here we come!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

